> ## Content Index
> Fetch the complete content index at: https://www.jermwarfare.com/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover other available public pages before exploring further.

# There's no way they landed on the moon in that crappy tin can
- URL: https://www.jermwarfare.com/theres-no-way-they-landed-on-the-moon-in-that-crappy-tin-can/
- Published: 2026-01-22T12:06:39.000Z
- Updated: 2026-05-12T06:55:12.000Z
- Description: Probability theory debunks the Apollo missions, argues Ferdinand Santos. The entire story is ridiculous, he says, from leaving Earth, to travelling to the moon, to landing on the moon, to walking on the moon, to leaving the moon, to returning to Earth, all without a single issue.
- Author: Jerm
- Tags: Moon landing, Apollo Mission, NASA, Ferdinand Santos, Propaganda, Cover-ups

Dr Ferdinand Santos III (not his real name), a scientist with a background in physics and IT, laid into space exploration and the Apollo missions so hard that Neil Armstrong thought he was back in flight school.

[Modern Scientism, Cults and the Age of darkness | Dr Ferdinand Santos III | SubstackScientistic cults including; Viruses, Corona, Climate, Gender, Cosmology, Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, String Theory, Copernicanism, Space travel, Evolution, Long Ages, Uniformitarianism. Click to read Modern Scientism, Cults and the Age of darkness, by Dr Ferdinand Santos III, a Substack publication with thousands of subscribers.![](https://storage.ghost.io/c/c7/82/c7826764-1091-409a-ac4a-3cdf32a7a528/content/images/icon/https-3A-2F-2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com-2Fpublic-2Fimages-2F467c6010-bb4b-4750-9396-6c165bc096e3-2Fapple-touch-icon-180x180.png)Modern Scientism, Cults and the Age of darknessDr Ferdinand Santos III![](https://storage.ghost.io/c/c7/82/c7826764-1091-409a-ac4a-3cdf32a7a528/content/images/thumbnail/https-3A-2F-2Funstabbinated.substack.com-2Ftwitter-2Fsubscribe-card.jpg%3Fv%3D-851322793%26version%3D9)](https://unstabbinated.substack.com/)

He argues that many historical space events, like the moon landing and Space X launching a car into space, were staged and questions the authenticity of the evidence presented. 

![](https://storage.ghost.io/c/c7/82/c7826764-1091-409a-ac4a-3cdf32a7a528/content/images/2026/01/Establishment_Controlling_Narratives-1.jpg)

Ferdinand adds that the technology and logistics claimed by NASA don't add up, and uses probability theory to debunk pretty much all of it. 

> If people want to believe it, that's entirely their affair, but I know we didn't go to the Moon.  
>  
> — Marcus Allen, publisher of Nexus magazine

He also discusses his views on scientism, suggesting that much of what is accepted as science is driven by philosophical rather than empirical evidence. 

## My newsletter

It has bigger balls than your ex-girlfriend

Subscribe 

Email sent! Check your inbox to complete your signup. 

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ferdinand is critical of mainstream narratives and encourages critical thinking to question established beliefs.

He asked why people believe the American or Soviet governments.

> 'There's no flame, there's no hole, there's no debris, and there's no noise.'

## 🎙️ Podcast episode

Ferdinand absolutely butchered the official narrative, in this episode for [my UK Column](https://www.ukcolumn.org/series/jerm-warfare?ref=jermwarfare.com) show.

The [audio episode](https://rss.com/podcasts/jerm-warfare-2025/2477034?ref=jermwarfare.com) is available on most podcast apps. If you use Apple, upgrade to the paid subscription to remove the ads.

Better yet, paid subscribers (above the first tier) to my website get access to my premium podcast, which has no ads and includes additional, exclusive content.

[Change subscription](#/portal/account/plans)

## Talking points

- Apollo missions versus scientism.
- CIA's involvement in NASA raises suspicion.
- Pilot training at the time was inadequate.
- Gagarin was used as Soviet propaganda tool.