Skip to content
How the whole world fell for the Covid PCR fraud

How the whole world fell for the Covid PCR fraud

PCR was never designed to test for viruses or diagnose disease, yet everyone, everywhere, fell for it. The man behind it was Christian Drosten — he designed the protocol the whole world adopted, got rich, and is now living the high life.

Before Covid was even a household name, Christian Drosten had already positioned himself as Germany's top virologist during the 2003 SARS "outbreak".

Then, on 13 January 2020, ten days before his paper was even published, Drosten's PCR test protocol was already sitting on the WHO's website as the official global testing standard.

He was working on a PCR test for Covid beginning in December 2019, prior to patient zero. It's weird, isn't it?

— Simon Goddek
🦠
A PCR test protocol is essentially a set of laboratory instructions for multiplying tiny fragments of genetic material until there is enough to detect them. The problem is that PCR can only detect fragments of genetic material, not viruses themselves. Viruses have never been detected or isolated using PCR.

The paper itself, received by the journal Eurosurveillance on 21 January and published just two days later on 23 January, went through what was basically a 24-hour "peer review", a process that normally takes weeks or months.

Totally nothing suspicious going on there.

Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR
Background The ongoing outbreak of the recently emerged novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) poses a challenge for public health laboratories as virus isolates are unavailable while there is growing evidence that the outbreak is more widespread than initially thought, and international spread through travellers does already occur. Aim We aimed to develop and deploy robust diagnostic methodology for use in public health laboratory settings without having virus material available. Methods Here we present a validated diagnostic workflow for 2019-nCoV, its design relying on close genetic relatedness of 2019-nCoV with SARS coronavirus, making use of synthetic nucleic acid technology. Results The workflow reliably detects 2019-nCoV, and further discriminates 2019-nCoV from SARS-CoV. Through coordination between academic and public laboratories, we confirmed assay exclusivity based on 297 original clinical specimens containing a full spectrum of human respiratory viruses. Control material is made available through European Virus Archive – Global (EVAg), a European Union infrastructure project. Conclusion The present study demonstrates the enormous response capacity achieved through coordination of academic and public laboratories in national and European research networks.

The paper is widely known as the Corman-Drosten protocol.

It was published within 24 hours from submission until publication. Which is unheard of. It's like your grandma winning a 100-metre race against Usain Bolt. It's not going to happen.

— Simon Goddek

To make matters worse, Drosten and co-author Chantal Reusken were both editors of Eurosurveillance at the time, meaning the journal that rushed the paper through had a direct conflict of interest with its own authors.

The scientific pushback

The scientific pushback came in November 2020, when an international group of scientists submitted a formal retraction request to Eurosurveillance, listing ten major scientific flaws in the Corman-Drosten paper.

The core problems included:

In other words, the diagnostic foundation for the entire global "pandemic response" was built on software guesses, not lab evidence.

In other other words, the entire world used a fraudulent PCR test.

Everybody's like Fauci, Fauci, Fauci, but it's Drosten. His role in Covid was massive. It's the main role.

— Simon Goddek

Not that it mattered.

Follow the money 💰

Then there is the money trail.

Some of Drosten's co-authors had direct financial stakes in the outcome:

Most importantly, TIB Molbiol was already shipping these kits to labs across Europe at least a week before the paper was even submitted to the journal, meaning the commercial product was on the market before the "science" backing it up had been published.

In other words, the Covid PCR tests were being shipped in December 2019, before anybody knew or said anything about Covid, and before his paper had been submitted, published, and cited by the WHO.

Again, totally nothing suspicious going on there.

Oh, and by the way, none of these conflicts of interest was mentioned in his original paper. Drosten, as the main author, had signed a mandatory declaration saying there were no conflicts of interest, a statement that was blatantly false. The conflicts were only quietly added on 29 July 2020, six months into the "pandemic".

Drosten made a lot of money from a fraudulent test, and the whole world fell for it. The test was a scam, meaning it was never testing for SARS-CoV-2, meaning the existence of SARS-CoV-2 has never been proven by the very tool that was supposed to prove it.

No proven virus. No proven novel disease. No proven pandemic.

The WHO adopted his protocol as the global standard.

The man whose test was used to justify lockdowns, travel bans, and the complete restructuring of daily life walked away completely unscathed, his reputation untouched, his business partners enriched, and the scientific system that should have held him to account choosing instead to protect him.

Simon Goddek is a German scientist and biotechnologist who was professionally destroyed for questioning the Covid narrative, and who now lives off-grid in Brazil building a self-sustaining homestead.

I discovered Simon in the early Covid years because he was the only one exposing Drosten at the time.

If you don't want to watch the above video, then listen on any podcast app. Jerm Warfare is no longer banned anywhere, as I type this.

Jerm Warfare podcast
Everything you need to know about the Jerm Warfare podcast.
They literally called me and said, "You have to know when to shut the fuck up." And I asked them, "Is my analysis wrong?" They said, "No, it's not wrong." So there it was, fraud.

— Simon Goddek

Posted by

Jerm

Jerm

We’re constantly bombarded with fake news, propaganda, agendas, and outright lies. It’s an information war. What is true? I don’t know either—but I’m trying to find out.

Related

Support me

There are several ways to support my work and help me stay independent and resilient in the face of constant censorship. Help me fight the good fight!