I remember the day. I'd just arrived at my girlfriend's house and heard her brother shouting from the lounge. Her mom and brother were standing in front of the TV, watching the first tower billowing smoke. Then the next plane hit and we all thought it was the start of WW3.

But what actually happened?

Where did all the rubble go?

Directed energy weapons turned the WTC to dust—molecular dissociation explains the missing debris and toasted cars blocks away.

— Judy Wood, mechanical engineer

Did planes hit the buildings and did jet fuel bring them down? Or did planes hit but controlled demolition—or mini-nukes—cause the collapse? Or did no planes hit and something else bring down the towers?

Toasted cars and melted glass with no fires scream DEWs—same tech we saw in Lahaina, not plane impacts.

— Andrew Johnson, researcher

The latter is what 9/11 Revisionist argues.

More specifically, he argues that directed energy weapons (DEW) were used and, based on the evidence, it's the only viable conclusion one can make.

'Empirical evidence is the truth that theory must mimic'

🎙️ Podcast episode

With so many visuals, it's a watching episode, not a listening one.

And it's long, but worth it.