What if the evidence suggests that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were firebombed, like Tokyo and Dresden? Why has an atom bomb not been dropped since? After all, there are more powerful bombs now. Is the "nuclear threat" just a propaganda narrative?
Everyone knows that the United States nuked Japan during World War II. After all, there are books and films about it and Hollywood never lies.
What if it's a cover-up?
Atomic bombs are a grand hoax perpetuated to instill fear and maintain global control, as no real nuclear detonation has ever occurred.
— Akio Nakatani, Japanese author
What if no atomic bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki and, instead, the cities were firebombed, similar to Tokyo that same year? Operation Meetinghouse, as it was called, was the deadliest air raid in human history.
Take a look at the following photos.
The first is Tokyo after it was firebombed in 1945. Notice the concrete buildings still standing.
The second is Hiroshima after it was "nuked" in 1945. Notice the concrete buildings still standing.
We’re constantly bombarded with fake news, propaganda, agendas, and outright lies.
It’s an information war.
What is true?
I don’t know either—but I’m trying to find out.
Michael Palmer’s book questions whether atomic bombs were actually dropped on Japan. True or not, why haven't we seen a nuclear weapon used in 80 years of threats? Is the entire concept just fearmongering for political leverage?
We keep hearing that China is colonising Africa and that we must watch it closely. But ironically, fixating on China creates a massive blind spot. The reality is that Western interests have long controlled Africa—and they’re determined not to lose that grip.
