9/11 Revisionist | Substack

The 9/11 “truth” movement forgot how to count past 3. Isn’t that strange? It won’t be easy for most to break their programming if they don’t have questions. Click to read 9/11 Revisionist, a Substack publication.

9/11 Revisionist9/11 Revisionist

My friend Norman — known online as 9/11 Revisionist, with a brutal Substack — not only joined me for coffee, we ate a delicious breakfast together.

He's been on my livestream before and his focus, as you might have guessed, is understanding what actually happened on 9/11 and revising the narratives.

I think he needs to be vindicated in many ways because he was not the architect of apartheid. The British were.

— Jerm, in conversation with Norman

We didn't really chat much about 9/11 this time, but we did get into why former South African prime minister Hendrik Verwoerd's separate-nations vision could have worked but never played out in reality.

Jews, Soviets, and the Soweto Uprising

In 1976, the South African apartheid government forced Afrikaans on Black pupils, then shot them when they pushed back. Meanwhile, the Soviet and Jewish influence behind the event is almost entirely ignored. Why?

Jerm WarfareJerm

We also bantered about

• South Africa's manufactured anti-immigration riots,
• the case for real borders, whether the pyramids were ancient power stations,
• why Darwinism is nonsense,
• the unsettling implications of Bob Greenyer's new 9/11 dust study,
• how multipolarity beats bending the knee to Washington,
• why the Amish are amazing,
• Michael Tellinger's stone circles,
• data centres as the new AI battleground for control,
• Charlie Kirk's oddly convenient assassination questions, and
• why it's important to listen to controversial guests.

I'll have Fauci on my show. I'll have Bill Gates. I'll have Hunter Biden on my show. That doesn't mean that I am going to agree with their conclusions.

— Jerm, in conversation with Norman

So that must count for something, I hope. 🤣

In all seriousness, I think it's a bad strategy to disregard what he says simply because he worked for the CIA. The world isn't a zero-sum game, and while it's entirely plausible that he'd hold back on revealing some things, there's no reason to believe he wouldn't reveal others.

Of course they were involved. It was the CIA and it was the generals that wanted to get at the Soviet Union.

Ray McGovern

For example, he openly says the CIA were involved in JFK's assassination. Another guest of mine — author Monika Wiesak, who's published two books on the assassination — makes the same argument. So does that mean Ray is lying because he worked for the CIA? Obviously not. If anything, it strengthens Monika's position.

A guy who hated Kennedy, who had legitimate grievances in his mind, grievances against Kennedy, who was fired by Kennedy, would end up directing the Warren Commission proceedings to find out who killed Kennedy.

Ray McGovern

As an aside, Monika also wrote an incredible book on why Michael Jackson was innocent and why everybody got him wrong — thanks to a massive media campaign to destroy him.

Michael Jackson knew

Everybody got the King of Pop wrong. He tried telling us, but nobody listened to his lyrics. The establishment destroyed him, and even in death, the media kept coming for him. He is the most misrepresented musician in history.

Jerm WarfareJerm

Her conversation with me about Michael is one of my most downloaded episodes.

Anyway.

Who is Ray McGovern?

Born in 1939 in the Bronx, Ray McGovern is a former CIA analyst who spent 27 years at the agency — from 1963 to 1990 — serving under seven US presidents. He holds a BA from Fordham University and an MA in Russian Language, Literature, and History.

During the Reagan years, he personally briefed Reagan's five most senior national security advisers.

When he retired in 1990, he was awarded the CIA's Intelligence Commendation Medal — which he handed back in 2006, writing that he 'abhorred the corruption of the CIA' and didn't want his name on any medallion associated with it.

Sometimes there are real conspiracies, you know, and if you uncover them, well, they call you a conspiracy theorist in hopes that you'll go away.

— Ray McGovern

In 2003, he co-founded Veterans Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS) — a group of former intelligence officers dedicated to challenging the political manipulation of intelligence, initially focused on the Iraq War.

You can, of course, listen to this on Apple, Spotify, or whatever podcast app you use. As of typing this, Jerm Warfare is no longer banned on any podcast platform.

If you use Apple, upgrade to the dirt-cheap paid subscription to remove the ads.

Or better yet, subscribe to my premium podcast — exclusive additional content, no ads.

I saw my former analyst colleagues prostituting our analyst trade so that Dick Cheney and George Bush could have their war in Iraq, a war totally unjustified, a war that was primarily sponsored or urged upon them by Zionists and by Zionist co-followers in Washington.

— Ray McGovern

This was a great conversation. Plus, it's not often one gets to talk to someone from the CIA.

But then, I like cracking tough nuts. 🤣

The problem with the 'it's the Jews' trope is that it's myopic and ignores nuance. On top of that, it implies that Jews are genetically superior to the rest of us, in that they are able to control everything and everyone.

If these Jews own all the media, why would they be exposing themselves that it's the Jews hate the Jews now?

— Steve Falconer

I'll cut to the chase. Here's my discussion with Steve Falconer about who controls everything and why it's not the Jews:

Steve — a great filmmaker — and I have been friends for years, ever since I discovered a brilliant documentary of his, about why 'viruses' have never been shown to cause disease.

Here's the said film:

Steve has made a massive new multi-part documentary, based on two decades of research, on who controls the world.

It's called Apocalypse Infinity.

And it's not the Jews, he concludes.

In it, he explains why it's easy to think it's the Jews: it's a deliberate distraction from what's really going on. While everybody keeps looking over there, they're not looking over here.

Basically, he argues that the world is controlled by a network of interrelated elite families and frameworks — the Black Nobility, Jesuits, Vatican, Freemasons, Knights Templar, a 'Cult of Venus', and more.

Who are the Black Nobility and why do they matter?

The most powerful people in the world.

Jerm WarfareJerm

I think there is truth in what Steve argues.

I'm not saying they're not involved. I'm saying they're not in charge. That's all I'm saying.

— Steve Falconer

For example, if it were the Jews — and only the Jews — then:

• why did they require the British Empire to create them a country in 1948 (and not centuries earlier)?
• why have they been kicked out of so many countries throughout history?
• why is Judaism not permitted in China?
• why has Israel itself remained heavily dependent on US military aid, diplomatic cover, and Western geopolitical support?
• why did wealthy Jewish banking families (like the Rothschilds) historically operate as clients of European monarchs and states, lending to them and serving them?
• why were large numbers of Jews in the Arab world expelled or marginalised after 1948, losing their property and status?
• why have so many powerful institutions (the Vatican, European monarchies, the CIA, MI6, Bilderberg, and so on) historically had few or no Jews at the top?

Here's one more for the road.

Why does the US one-dollar bill have a pyramid with an all-seeing eye on it, with 'New Order of the Ages' written in Latin around it?

Jews speak Hebrew.

The Vatican speaks Latin.

You don't rob a bank unless you have a scapegoat. You need like an alibi. So you got to blame somebody. That's what they do. They always put Jews out in front. They've always done that.

— Steve Falconer

As always, please subscribe to my podcast on whichever app you use. Upgrade to the paid subscription to remove ads, if you use Apple Podcasts.

Better yet, subscribe to my premium podcast, which has no ads and includes additional, exclusive content.

Jerm Warfare podcast

Everything you need to know about the Jerm Warfare podcast.

Jerm WarfareJerm

The Ethical Skeptic - Challenging Pseudo-Skepticism, its Agency and Cultivated Ignorance

Ethical skepticism is a pro-science paradigm shift challenging pseudo-skepticism, its agency and cultivated ignorance. Epoché Vanguards Gnosis.

The Ethical SkepticThe Ethical Skeptic

As an aside, I'd spell it 'sceptic' — the British way — but he's American and uses a 'k'.

Basically, he argues:

• the pyramids are far older than mainstream Egyptology claims,
• were built by a lost civilisation using advanced water-based machinery,
• show clear physical evidence of being submerged under hundreds of feet of ocean water, and
• were likely built as devices to monitor or warn against catastrophic pole-shift events — not as tombs.

I've had a few related conversations, all very interesting and worth listening to, which can be found under the pyramids tag.

Pyramids - Jerm Warfare

It’s an information war. What is true? I don’t know either—but I’m trying to find out.

Jerm Warfare

'The pyramids are far older than mainstream Egyptology claims.'

I am no longer persuaded by the mainstream version of how the pyramids were built. For clarity, what I was taught in school goes something like this:

❌ The mainstream argument

• The Great Pyramid was built as a tomb for Pharaoh Khufu (Cheops), who ruled during the Fourth Dynasty (2589–2566 BC). It was constructed over roughly 20–26 years.
• Not slaves, as the old story went, but tens of thousands of skilled labourers who camped near the site and worked for a salary or as a form of tax payment (corvée).
• Around 2.3 million limestone blocks, averaging 2.5 metric tonnes each, were quarried nearby, hauled on wooden sledges over sand, and raised into place using large ramps. They used copper chisels and stone tools for everything.

Nah.

It doesn't make sense

• 2.3 million blocks over 20 years works out to roughly one block every five minutes, 24 hours a day, seven days a week, for two decades — and that's with no days off, no mistakes, no bad weather, no supply chain hiccups, and no time for the increasingly complex upper courses.
• That's 315 blocks per day, every day. Each one has to be quarried, shaped, transported across the plateau, hauled up the growing structure, and placed with millimetre precision — using copper tools and ropes.
• The blocks aren't uniform. As the pyramid rises, blocks get smaller but placement gets harder and the logistics of lifting anything to height with ramps becomes a nightmare.

And that completely ignores the precision of everything. I mean, they did all of that with a hammer and chisel?

I find Roger's arguments far more compelling.

Please subscribe to my podcast on most apps. As I type this, Jerm Warfare is no longer banned anywhere.

Jerm Warfare podcast

Everything you need to know about the Jerm Warfare podcast.

Jerm WarfareJerm

To remove the ads, either upgrade to a paid subscription on Apple Podcasts, or—better yet—subscribe to my premium podcast (which has exclusive, additional content and no ads).

For example, I've had similar ones about:

• why there is no Uyghur genocide in China;
• why there was no Rwandan genocide;
• why the Christchurch mosque massacre was a cover-up by the New Zealand government; and
• why the Sandy Hook school shooting didn't happen.

Of course, there are way more, but my point is that I really enjoy challenging established narratives. Or, more accurately, letting my podcast guests challenge them.

Jerm Warfare podcast

Everything you need to know about the Jerm Warfare podcast.

Jerm WarfareJerm

PD Lawton is a South African-born independent writer and researcher who runs African Agenda, a website focused on African geopolitics.

Her work on Nigeria and, specifically, Boko Haram and the genocide of Christians, caught my attention.

Except that there is no genocide of Christians, argues PD.

I've been hearing this claim for years, and I've never quite understood why, in Nigeria, Muslims are trying to wipe out Christians.

The official claim is that Nigeria is in the midst of a systematic, Islamist-driven genocide against Christians — that the government is complicit, and that over 100,000 Christians have been killed with tens of thousands of churches destroyed.

Yes, Christians are being brutally killed. But the question is whether or not they're being targeted because of their faith.

Even the US president has jumped on board.

Think about this for ten seconds.

Would the US government really spend millions of dollars to send the military to bomb an African village for no reason other than simply helping Christians?

Of course not.

But it gets better.

It's as if Trump is the messiah, saving mankind and delivering us from evil. 😇

Amen.

It's the perfect distraction — manufacturing a low-resolution conflict between Christians and Muslims, whilst the oligarchs and public-private partnerships pulling the strings stay hidden.

Well, as it happens, there is something else going on, which is what PD's research reveals.

And it's the same agenda again and again and again.

Money and power.

It's not a religious war.

It's a geopolitical war.

In short, PD's argument is that the 'Christian genocide' narrative is a ruse to obfuscate what's really happening: a Western-backed mineral resource grab. The violence isn't religious — it's synthetic insurgency designed to keep Nigeria in chaos so lithium, uranium, and gold can be looted, with the media's job being to sell the public a 'Muslims killing Christians' cover story.

• In absolute numbers, Muslims die in far higher numbers because the violence is concentrated in the Muslim-majority north where most of the population lives.
• Christians die more proportionally to their population in certain regions (especially the Middle Belt) where farmer-herder clashes overlap with religious identity.
• But most jihadist violence isn't religiously selective — Boko Haram and ISWAP kill anyone they see as opposing them, including large numbers of Muslims, Muslim clerics, and Muslim civilians.

I find this compelling.

If you don't feel like watching the video, then please subscribe to my podcast. You can listen to this conversation right now.

In fact, do it anyway and leave a 5-star review so that others can discover my podcast.

People across the world are subscribed. Even Nigerians. 🤣

Please leave a comment — I'd like to know what you think of PD's conclusions.

They are kind of like a creative outlet.

But does that mean Google is the best?

Absolutely not.

In fact, I haven't used any Google products for a few years now — except Google Maps, because the alternatives simply aren't as reliable. Google somehow got this one right. But that's the extent of my support for them.

Searching the internet is a big part of my daily life, and that includes using AI — because, honestly, AI is pretty much a search engine on steroids.

Why artificial intelligence will never take over

Stop worrying about machines controlling humanity. It can’t and won’t ever happen for a number of very good reasons, one of the main ones being that AI lacks willpower and desire. If AI takes over, then it’s because humanity has allowed and enabled it to do so.

Jerm WarfareJerm

No, I don't fear AI.

Yes, I use AI.

It's just a tool — it can be used for good or bad, and I choose to use it for my benefit.

So, I'm going to share with you what I've been using for a few years (including AI), and why I haven't looked back.

It's called Youth Day and it commemorates the uprising in Soweto on 16 June 1976.

The official story

In short, the apartheid government made a morally bankrupt decision to teach Black pupils in Afrikaans, which was never going to end well, since it was not their mother tongue. Naturally, there was pushback, which ended in street protests and lethal force by the government — another morally bankrupt decision.

After all, why use live ammunition on kids?

Well, that's exactly what they did, killing some, and the news went global.

The 16 June 1976 uprising had roots going back to 1953, when the apartheid government passed the Bantu Education Act — a deliberate policy to give black South Africans an inferior education designed to keep them as a permanent labour underclass. As Dr Verwoerd, the architect of apartheid, infamously put it: "Natives must be taught from an early age that equality with Europeans is not for them."

The immediate trigger came in 1974, when Deputy Minister Andries Treurnicht issued the Afrikaans Medium Decree, instructing all black schools to teach core subjects like Maths, Social Sciences, and Geography through Afrikaans — a language students and teachers neither spoke fluently nor wanted to use. Students saw Afrikaans as the language of their oppressors, and resistance began building immediately.

But there's another part to the story, deliberately suppressed and ignored, and that is the significant Soviet and Jewish influence behind the entire event.

🔍 The fuller version

The Soweto Uprising wasn't just an organic, spontaneous student revolt — it was the moment a genuine wave of Black anger was harvested by a Soviet-backed, Jewish-led communist machine.

The students' fury at forced Afrikaans education was real, but the apartheid government's own Cillie Commission found no evidence the march was externally organised, and student leader Tsietsi Mashiniji explicitly denied outside agitators.

If I were forced to learn in a language that isn't my mother tongue, I'd also have been angry. So, the pushback is understandable and, as Simon said on my podcast, the apartheid government utterly lost the moral high ground here.

What mattered was what happened after: thousands of radicalised young people fled South Africa straight into the arms of Umkhonto we Sizwe (MK), the ANC's armed wing — whose operational backbone was the South African Communist Party (SACP), led overwhelmingly by Jews.

Jewish activists were overrepresented among White anti-apartheid figures by roughly 2,500% — immigrants who brought socialist radicalism from the Pale of Settlement (the restricted zone in the Russian Empire where Jews were forced to live, circa 1791–1917) and then built the SACP into the engine of the armed struggle.

That engine was funded, armed, and trained by the Soviet Union — not out of goodwill, but for:

• chromium, platinum, and manganese that the Western military depended on,
• control of the vital Cape sea route (the shipping lane around the southern tip of Africa), and
• Cold War encirclement of a key Western ally.

The angry students were real.

The ideological and geopolitical machinery that hijacked their anger and steered it toward a Marxist-Leninist revolution — that was a different agenda, and it's the part always left out of Youth Day discourse.

There is thus no policy of oppression here, but one of creating a situation which has never existed for the Bantu; namely, that, taking into consideration their languages, traditions, history and different national communities, they may pass through a development of their own.

Hendrik Verwoerd, former South African Prime Minister

About Jewish influence

Author Kevin MacDonald argues that Jewish overrepresentation in communist, 'left wing', and civil rights movements across centuries and continents is not coincidence or altruism, but an unconscious ethnic survival strategy.

How have Jews influenced Western society?

An evolutionary analysis of Jewish involvement in 20th-century intellectual and political movements.

Jerm WarfareJerm

According to him, Jews have historically faced existential threat from homogeneous, ethnically confident majority populations, so weakening that majority's cohesion — through multiculturalism, mass immigration, universalism, and revolutionary politics — reduces the risk of the majority organising against them.

It makes sense when you think of it like that.

Ironically, none of that applies to Israel.

In South Africa, breaking Afrikaner nationalism was paramount to Jewish and Soviet interests.

To be clear, nothing said here is either offensive or 'antisemitic'. It's straightforward history, albeit slightly uncomfortable in some circles.

🎙️ Podcast episode

Simon Roche, spokesman for Die Suidlanders, gave a politically incorrect breakdown of everything, with some extra, more nuanced bits on former South African Prime Minister Hendrik Verwoerd.

This conversation is available on most podcast apps. If you use Apple Podcasts, upgrade to the paid subscription to remove the ads.

Jerm Warfare podcast

Everything you need to know about the Jerm Warfare podcast.

Jerm WarfareJerm

Better yet, listen to it on my premium podcast, which has additional exclusive content.

Both Bantu and European must, therefore, consider in good time how this misery can be averted from themselves and from their descendants. They must find a plan to provide the two population groups with opportunities for the full development of their respective powers and ambitions without coming into conflict.

— Hendrik Verwoerd, former South African Prime Minister

Those are lyrics from 'They Don't Care About Us' (1995) on Michael Jackson's album HIStory. (His story, not history. When you think of it like that, it changes things.)

Play that song on Apple Music (or anywhere, really) and you'll hear loud sounds drowning out 'Jew' and 'Kike'. The words are also scrubbed from the lyrics in Apple Music but, interestingly, not in Spotify.

For context, a tight-knit network of entertainment industry lawyers, psychiatrists, and executives — who happened to be predominantly Jewish — were the operational machinery behind both the 1993 and 2003 attacks on Michael Jackson, from which he never really recovered.

The media can put an allegation out there, you know, within an hour, the whole globe knows about it.

— Monika Wiesak

And here's the original, angry, 'Michael in prison' music video, directed by Spike Lee — later 'replaced' by the colourful, vibrant, politically correct version shot in Brazil (which is the version everybody knows, since the original was suppressed). The latter version makes no sense anyway; a bunch of happy people dancing in the streets, joyfully singing 'they don't really care about us' is ridiculous.

Excellent book 📖

Monika Wiesak wrote a book called Michael Jackson: The Man, the Music, the Controversy, which basically argues that he was an innocent man destroyed by a lying media, a predatory music industry, and a public that never bothered to question what it was being told.

Monika has done a huge amount of deep diving, and as a fan of Michael's music, I'm thrilled that she hasn't just challenged the mainstream narrative — she's utterly debunked it.

Here's Amazon's summary of her book:

Michael Jackson was globally famous yet misunderstood by many. He was loved by his fans and demonized by the corporate press. He became famous at a young age and soared to superstardom as a young adult. As he matured, so did his music. He sang of unity, peace, and harmony, and against war and injustice. He created his beloved Neverland Ranch to serve as a healing escape for others. As the years went on, the press attacks grew more vicious. Then, the molestation allegations began. The media spoke of the accusations as if copious evidence backed them up. However, a closer look reveals that they fall apart under scrutiny.

This book details the story of Michael Jackson, from his youth through long past his death. It explores the false rumors spread over the years and sheds light on who the man truly was. It also offers a revealing look at the world of power, media, and entertainment.

This isn't a frivolous topic.

It's linked to the usual suspects, and all roads lead to Jeffrey Epstein. Tommy Mottola, for example, appears in the Epstein files, thousands of times.

It is the media's fault for propagandising people. But it's also the public's fault for being so gullible to propaganda.

— Monika Wiesak

Who is Tommy Mottola?

He was the Chairman and CEO of Sony Music Entertainment, had ties to P Diddy, and Michael wanted nothing to do with him.

Michael Jackson knew.

Discussion with Monika

I really enjoyed this conversation. It's just such a pity that Michael isn't around to see people finally waking up.

If you'd rather listen than watch, you can find me on most podcast apps, including Apple and Spotify.

Jerm Warfare isn't banned from any of them, right now.

Apple users can upgrade to the paid tier to remove ads.

Jerm Warfare podcast

Everything you need to know about the Jerm Warfare podcast.

Jerm WarfareJerm

Better yet, subscribe to my premium podcast: no ads, plus exclusive content you won't find anywhere else.

The question I have is: did Michael Jackson really die from a drug overdose?

Explore 432 Hz Music | Conspiracy Music Guru | Discover Conscious Music

Conscious music is what Conspiracy Music Guru is all about, exposing the greatest deceptions with lyrics that inform and teach. Freeing minds one song at a time.

ConspiracyMusicGuru

His YouTube channel has a bunch of his music videos too.

Before I go further, I want to give props to a 'conspiracy' song I stumbled across during the Covid era by a rapper called Vinnie Paz. The track is called End of Days and opens with a bit by David Icke (who has been on my podcast a few times).

Rockefellers and frequencies 🎶

It's a bit complicated to explain, but he basically argues that the global music standard of 440 Hz was deliberately imposed by elites — including the Rockefeller Foundation and Nazis — to keep people anxious, agitated, and disconnected from their natural state.

Hz (short for Hertz) is simply a measure of how many times something vibrates or oscillates per second. So when we say a sound is 440 Hz, it means whatever is making that sound — like a guitar string — is vibrating back and forth 440 times every second. The more vibrations per second, the higher the pitch you hear; fewer vibrations means a lower pitch. That's really all it is — a count of wobbles per second.

Alex argues that 432 Hz, the frequency ancient civilisations and naturally gifted musicians gravitate towards, is what our bodies actually resonate with, promoting healing and emotional balance — so the people in charge changed the tuning of all modern music to make us sick and anxious.

Returning to 432 Hz would help undo that damage.

Regarding the influence of the Rockefellers and Nazis, I found this interesting video on Substack.

I don't know, though.

After all, most of what we've been told about the Nazis is fabricated, which makes me doubt the Rockefeller bit. Then again, the Rockefellers have been involved in pretty much everything bad — so there's that.

Let me know your thoughts in the comment section below. ⬇️

There are actually studies

Before you dismiss it all as nonsense, it's worth knowing that some studies have actually shown that 432 Hz results in a more relaxed state.

• Calamassi & Pomponi (2019)
• Aravena et al. (2020)
• Calamassi et al. (2022)
• Schiavon et al. (2020)
• Aravena et al. (2025)

To be fair, I wouldn't be able to tell the difference between the frequencies because I mostly listen to (and write) punk rock and music your mother generally hated.

I wrote and recorded a song!

In this live stream, I chatted about one of my hobbies—writing and recording music—as well as my thoughts on why the media destroyed Michael Jackson. I also played a song I recently recorded.

Jerm WarfareJerm

Anyway...

My conversation with Alex below is also available on most podcast apps. If you want to remove the ads, subscribe to my premium podcast.

Also, if you use Apple Podcasts, then upgrade to a paid subscription to remove the ads. Just remember that it isn't the same as a paid subscription on jermwarfare.com.

'If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration.'

— Nikola Tesla

9/11 Revisionist | Substack

The 9/11 “truth” movement forgot how to count past 3. Isn’t that strange? It won’t be easy for most to break their programming if they don’t have questions. Click to read 9/11 Revisionist, a Substack publication.

9/11 Revisionist9/11 Revisionist

We went all over the place but, basically, we discussed chemtrails and how Jim Lee's argument — that it's aviation pollution rather than a deliberate spray programme — provoked outrage in the 'truth community'.

'The real nefarious stuff is happening where you can't see it.'

Then we touched on 9/11 anomalies, like the absence of rubble, the South Tower's top vanishing, most people forgetting Building 7, and Judy Wood's dustification theory.

We moved onto UFO disclosure as cover for hidden technology, the pyramids as power structures rather than tombs, Tartaria and the mud flood theory, and a brief mention of the flat-Earth narrative.

Like I said, we went all over the place.

Perhaps more importantly, we also discussed how the 'truth community' has fractured since the Covid era. Everyone's busy accusing everyone else of being a shill—which is textbook divide and conquer. This is a big one for me, because I've been on the receiving end of such accusations many times—labelled a gatekeeper, a grifter, controlled opposition, and—hilariously—a 'Chinamaxxer', a term I only recently discovered.

I didn't know what it meant, so I looked it up:

Chinamaxxing is a Gen Z social media trend where Westerners adopt and romanticise Chinese lifestyle habits and culture, treating it as an online identity — basically "maxing out" their appreciation for all things Chinese.

After I returned from China last year, I celebrated the country's reduction in crime, which apparently means I'm now a 'Chinamaxxer'.

Dismantling the ‘three camps of awareness’ nonsense

A former guest on my podcast, David Hughes, wrote a bizarre article in which he questioned my independence—hinting that I might be controlled opposition. It’s just that, well, he has no supporting evidence. Why is he trying to create unnecessary suspicion and enemies?

Jerm WarfareJerm

After my wife and I returned from France a few years ago, I celebrated the country's historical architectural beauty. I wonder if that means I'm also a 'Francemaxxer'.

'By perpetuating infighting, you are doing the work of the establishment.'

🎥 Live stream

I digress.

Here is my live stream with Norman. It was great fun.

I own two guitars: a Taylor acoustic, and a Fender electric that was a gift from my parents many, many years ago.

Now, to be clear, I don't know what I'm doing most of the time.

I am not a very good guitarist and my musical theory is non-existent. I basically play four power chords and make a lot of noise doing it.

Also, I can't sing.

But none of this matters because, as I said, it's just a hobby.

Morley is a former hospital executive who walked away from the system after realising it had his own diagnosis backwards.

Root Cause Protocol | Reverse Inflammation | Morley Robbins

Reverse inflammatory disease and oxidative stress by following the steps of the Root Cause Protocol, created by medical researcher, Morley Robbins.

The Root Cause Protocol

Basically, his core argument is that chronic disease is a mineral dysfunction problem, not a germ problem, centred around:

• too little copper and magnesium to regulate iron,
• too much unregulated iron accumulating, and
• a medical system that keeps treating the downstream symptoms.

This is such an interesting angle because it goes to the absolute root cause, as per the name of his protocol.

'Fix the terrain and the germs become irrelevant.'

In his conversation with me, he mentioned Antoine Béchamp's work, which sadly most people don't know about. He was a contemporary of Louis Pasteur — who was a fraud, according to a book I read called Béchamp or Pasteur? — and essentially argued that it's not the germ that causes disease, but the terrain. The internal environment of the body — its mineral status, its cellular energy, its ability to regulate iron — determines whether you get sick, not the presence of a pathogen.

Béchamp believed that microorganisms arise from within the body when the terrain is compromised, rather than being the primary invaders from outside that Pasteur made them out to be.

In other words, fix the terrain and the germs become irrelevant.

Viruses - Jerm Warfare

What if contagious diseases don’t exist?

Jerm Warfare

This is a view held by numerous guests on my podcast, thankfully.

🎙️ Podcast episode

You're welcome to listen to the following conversation with Morley on most podcast apps.

Currently, as I type this, I'm not banned anywhere. If you use Apple, upgrade to the paid subscription to remove the ads, or use my premium podcast to remove the ads and get additional content.

'The primary cause of disease is in us, always in us.'

— Antoine Béchamp

Observational studies of increasingly better quality and in different settings suggest that planned hospital birth in many places does not reduce mortality and morbidity but increases the frequency of interventions and complications.

Euro-Peristat (part of the European Union's Health Monitoring Programme) has raised concerns about iatrogenic effects of obstetric interventions, and the World Health Organization (WHO) has raised concern that the increasing medicalisation of childbirth tends to undermine women’s own capability to give birth and negatively impacts their childbirth experience. 

Put another way, home births are not 'more risky' than hospital births, and they do not lead to more things going wrong.

In fact, hospitals lead to extra interventions, each with risks and complications pregnant women don't need, making hospital births less safe in many cases.

Home Birth vs Hospital Birth (2026 Comparison)

Side-by-side comparison of home birth vs hospital birth: safety, intervention rates, cost, pain management, recovery, and who each setting is right for.

Home Birth PartnersHome Birth Partners Editors

Just to be clear, when I talk about home births, I am including the presence of a midwife.

Think about this.

Quick comparison

What medical interventions occur with a home birth?

Pretty much none.

What medical interventions occur with a hospital birth? Well, here's a list I copied and pasted:

• Continuous fetal monitoring: Restricts a mother's movement, which slows labour and increases the likelihood of unnecessary C-sections.
• IV fluids: Can cause fluid overload in the mother and low blood sugar in the newborn, while tethering the mother to a bed.
• Artificial rupture of membranes: Often fails to shorten labour but increases the risk of infection and fetal heart rate irregularities.
• Pitocin: Can cause 'hyperstimulation,' leading to dangerously intense contractions that may cut off oxygen to the baby or risk uterine rupture.
• Epidurals: Often cause low blood pressure, limit mobility, and significantly increase the odds of needing forceps, a vacuum, or a C-section.
• Frequent vaginal exams: Can increase infection risk, are invasive, and are often used to justify further interventions based on arbitrary timelines.
• Episiotomy: An outdated practice that can cause more pain, slower healing, and deeper, more severe tearing than natural stretching.
• Forceps or vacuum extraction: Used to speed up a 'stalled' birth, these tools pose risks of scalp injury, bruising, and nerve damage to the baby.
• C-section: Major surgery carrying risks of infection, heavy bleeding, and organ damage, while complicating recovery and future pregnancies.

And those are just the common ones. There are many more, all of which don't happen in the comfort of the mother's quiet, warm home.

And the thing that Dr Stu emphasises is that childbirth is not a medical condition.

'Childbirth is not a medical condition.'

If childbirth is not a medical condition, then why do most childbirths occur in hospitals?

Money.

Think about this again.

Why lie on your back?

Why are humans the only mammals that give birth in a hospital? Elephants don't go to a hospital to give birth. Neither do lions. Nor do dogs.

Moreover, why are humans the only mammals that lie on their backs to give birth?

It makes no sense.

But it makes cents.

Lots of cents.

Did you know?

The Bizarre Reason Why Women Started Giving Birth on Their Backs - Stork Helpers

Stork Helpers serves in Cincinnati & Dayton. Read our blog - The Bizarre Reason Why Women Started Giving Birth on Their Backs to learn more. Contact us!

Stork Helpers | Cincinnati & Dayton Doulas, Placenta Encapsulationtamarak

Women lying on their backs during birth became standard in the 17th–18th centuries, largely thanks to male doctors wanting to have a look, a voyeuristic French king, and the invention of forceps — none of which had anything to do with what's actually best for the mother (and baby).

• For most of human history, women gave birth upright — squatting, kneeling, or sitting on a birthing stool. Gravity does the work. It's faster, less painful, and opens the pelvis wider.
• King Louis XIV — who fathered 22 children — liked to watch his mistresses give birth, and the lying-down position gave him a better view. Midwives went along with it to keep the king happy.
• Then male doctors took over from midwives. As medicine became professionalised, men pushed midwives out. The lying-down position suited doctors— it was easier for them to examine, intervene, and use instruments to prod and poke.
• The invention of forceps in the 17th–18th centuries required the woman to be flat on her back for the doctor to use them. The 'lithotomy position' (back flat, legs in stirrups) was originally designed for removing gallstones, not giving birth.

None of it is for the benefit of the mother and baby.

All of it is for the benefit of the system.

🎙️ Discussion

Dr Stu and I have known each other for years, so this was a great catch-up. Of course, I also recommend our conversation from 2024.

Please subscribe and listen to my podcast on most apps. If you use Apple, upgrade to the paid subscription to remove the ads. Or use my premium podcast to listen without ads and get additional, exclusive content.

This is such an important topic, in my opinion.

By extension, therefore, he maintains that nuclear weapons simply don't exist. Or if they do, there isn't any convincing evidence.

It's certainly a head-scratcher, especially since we've been programmed our whole lives to believe that nukes are real and that the only reason they haven't been used is the fear of total global destruction—or something like that.

This book explores the claim that nuclear weapons do not function, they are a large-scale hoax. I call this hoax the Fake Nuke Feint.

— Akio Nakatani, 'Death Object - Exploding The Nuclear Weapons Hoax'

There's a surprisingly coherent case to be made that nuclear weapons are an elaborate Cold War psyop built on government secrecy, fake physics, Hollywood-produced footage, and the fact that Hiroshima and Nagasaki look a lot like conventional firebombing jobs, as Michael has shown.

As a matter of interest, the secrecy around the Manhattan Project was architecturally designed to prevent anyone from understanding the whole picture.

• Secrecy was so complete that the majority of the 130,000+ workers didn't know what they were building until they heard about Hiroshima on the radio.
• Workers were told only what they needed to know and were forbidden from discussing their jobs with anyone — including their wives.
• The entire project ran on compartmentalisation — the deliberate fragmentation of knowledge so no single person outside the top tier could verify the whole.

If you wanted to run a massive deception operation, this is exactly how you'd structure it.

Let's assume that...

Okay, so if Japan wasn't nuked, it becomes an incredibly hard sell to make a convincing argument for the existence of nuclear weapons.

Consider the following.

• Lab experiments with supercritical masses of highly-enriched uranium show that nuclear chain reactions rapidly self-extinguish — the heat generated reduces the material's capacity to sustain the reaction.
• Every single study claiming nuclear weapons are feasible originates from Los Alamos National Laboratory — there is no independent verification. The simulation software used (PAD, PAGOSA) is not publicly available. Why?
• The claim that there is 'scientific consensus' on nuclear weapon feasibility is really just a consensus manufactured entirely within classified government institutions.  In other words, governments agree with one another.

After all, 80 years of threats, loads of intense wars, mass destruction, genocides—and yet no nukes?

Hollywood

The US Air Force operated a secret Hollywood-quality film studio called Lookout Mountain in Laurel Canyon, California, staffed by professional filmmakers, which produced atomic weapons documentaries and training films with suspiciously high production values for Cold War propaganda.

Some theorists suggest that footage like the Trinity Test blast could have been staged using conventional explosives and clever cinematography techniques rather than actual nukes.

Hmm...

Why, though?

Well, think about it.

A 'super-weapon' that nobody can independently verify is the perfect geopolitical control tool.

The threat is more useful than the weapon itself. 

Both the US and Soviet Union had every incentive to mutually maintain the hoax — it justified astronomical military budgets, kept populations in fear, and gave both governments near-unlimited power to act in the name of 'national security'.

So, fear and control.

🎙️ Podcast episode

You are welcome to listen on most podcast apps. If you use Apple, upgrade to the paid subscription to remove the ads, or listen via my premium podcast (Paid Subscription 2.0 and higher).

Look, it's possible nuclear weapons exist, but how would we know?

An interesting alternative commentator, Miles Mathis, argues that nuclear weapons are essentially a giant hoax—that no nuclear bomb has ever actually been detonated. He claims the whole thing is a state-run psyop using conventional explosives, dodgy photos, and fearmongering to keep governments funded and populations scared.

Again, why has no nuclear weapon been used in 80 years?