Here in South Africa, there's a place called the The Cradle of Humankind, which is a paleoanthropological site located about 50 km northwest of Johannesburg. Apparently, it's one of the birthplaces of humanity.

Nah.
I don't buy it.
It's absurd to think these dogmas are untouchable.
— Bruce Fenton
Bruce Fenton, author of The Forgotten Exodus: The Into Africa Theory of Human Evolution, also doesn't buy it. He argues that humans didn't originate in Africa and then migrate 'out of Africa.' Instead, they originated in various places around the world and eventually made their way into Africa.

By 'originate,' he isn't referring to Darwinian evolution, which is an establishment narrative suggesting that all life follows a chronological timeline from simplicity to complexity.
The Into Africa Theory does not dispute the evidence placing the earliest hominins in Africa. However, it does not agree with the consensus view that Homo sapiens emerged there first and later migrated to Eurasia.
Darwinian evolution is bunk
Consider the following.
We are told that birds developed wings over millions of years. However, for millions of years before they could fly, they had poles slowly growing out of and protruding from their bodies, which would have been highly obstructive, restrictive, and easy targets.
It's laughable.
The theory of evolution is nonsense—it’s mathematically impossible for random mutations to build something as intricate as life.
— Fred Hoyle, astronomer and mathematician