Roger Cunningham, aka The Ethical Skeptic, argues that the pyramids are thousands of years older than we're told and that there's an archaeological cover-up of the truth. He also claims the pyramids were underwater for centuries, in line with the Genesis flood story.
Nuclear physicist Max Fomitchev-Zamilov argues the ancient Egyptians had nuclear technology. After finding predynastic stone vessels machined to modern precision, he proposed they cut granite with polonium-210-coated 'alpha blades' and electron-saturating 'beta blades' — not copper chisels.
What if advanced technology existed in prehistory and that everything we think we know about the pyramids is wrong?
What if the pyramids were built by an advanced civilisation and the Great Pyramid was not a tomb, but a sophisticated machine? And what if the pyramids were underwater for centuries, thousands of years ago, more or less in line with the Biblical Flood?
We all assume that everything has a simple starting point. But what if history does not follow a chronological timeline and, instead, loops in cycles from primitive stages to advanced peaks? Is it really a crazy thought?
There are several ways to support my work and help me stay independent and resilient in the face of constant censorship. Help me fight the good fight!
