Skip to content
What if Earth's history is cyclical?

What if Earth's history is cyclical?

We all assume that everything has a simple starting point. But what if history does not follow a chronological timeline and, instead, loops in cycles from primitive stages to advanced peaks? Is it really a crazy thought?

I quite like revisionist history.

Ben van Kerkwyk runs a YouTube channel called UnchartedX which explores alternative theories on ancient civilisations, especially Egypt, challenging mainstream historical narratives about our past.

UnchartedX
Hi, my name is Ben van Kerkwyk, welcome to UnchartedX. I’m a long-time student and fan of history. I’ve spent a lot of time throughout my life travelling to, photographing and filming ancient sites all around the world, and (more recently) interviewing and talking to many of the leading researchers and authors, many of whom are working to uncover the true origins of the mystery that is our past. I believe there is a need for high quality content that addresses the new science and new discoveries that should affect how we view the past, and to examine the contradictions that are clearly evident on ancient sites, and in our orthodox version of history. I hope you’ll join me on this journey! Please consider the value-for-value model as outlined at https://unchartedx.com/support!

The argument that caught my attention is this: history follows a cyclical pattern.

Advanced ancient civilisations rise, then fall to cataclysmic events—like mega-floods and other disasters—that wipe out knowledge and force humanity to restart.

I see the Genesis creation story as a possible account of one such reset.

Which means the Big Bang and Darwinian theory are probably bunk.

It's not a new idea

The dominant story we're taught — that history is a one-way march from primitive savagery to enlightened modernity — is a surprisingly recent idea.

It really took hold with Hegel's teleological philosophy and later Marx's dialectical materialism, both of which conveniently placed their own era at the apex of human development. This is sometimes called 'Whig history' — the habit of reading the past as an inevitable build-up to the present. It's flattering to whoever's currently in charge. It says: we are the point of it all.

Empires, institutions, and ideologies love this framing because it implies they're the destination, not just another stop on the wheel.

But before the West got hold of the narrative, almost every major civilisation thought about time cyclically.

The establishment dismisses this because cyclical history is deeply threatening to those in power.

Ancient Egyptians possessed lost technologies for precise stonework that modern experts struggle to replicate.

Christopher Dunn

Why the establishment suppresses it

The linear progress narrative isn't just wrong — it's useful to those in power.

The cyclical view was dominant in the ancient world, in Islamic scholarship, in Hindu cosmology (the yugas), and in Chinese dynastic theory.

It was only when European powers needed to justify colonialism and their own dominance that 'linear progress' became the official story.

🎙️ Podcast episode

In this episode, Ben used a lot of visuals.

Posted by

Jerm

Jerm

We’re constantly bombarded with fake news, propaganda, agendas, and outright lies. It’s an information war. What is true? I don’t know either—but I’m trying to find out.

Related

It's not the Jews

It's not the Jews

The pyramids are thousands of years older than we're told

The pyramids are thousands of years older than we're told

The West wasn't founded on Christianity

The West wasn't founded on Christianity

Support me

There are several ways to support my work and help me stay independent and resilient in the face of constant censorship. Help me fight the good fight!