There's no way they landed on the moon in that crappy tin can
Probability theory debunks the Apollo missions, argues Ferdinand Santos. The entire story is ridiculous, he says, from leaving Earth, to travelling to the moon, to landing on the moon, to walking on the moon, to leaving the moon, to returning to Earth, all without a single issue.
Dr Ferdinand Santos III (not his real name), a scientist with a background in physics and IT, laid into space exploration and the Apollo missions so hard that Neil Armstrong thought he was back in flight school.
He argues that many historical space events, like the moon landing and Space X launching a car into space, were staged and questions the authenticity of the evidence presented.
Ferdinand adds that the technology and logistics claimed by NASA don't add up, and uses probability theory to debunk pretty much all of it.
If people want to believe it, that's entirely their affair, but I know we didn't go to the Moon.
— Marcus Allen, publisher of Nexus magazine
He also discusses his views on scientism, suggesting that much of what is accepted as science is driven by philosophical rather than empirical evidence.
My newsletter
It has bigger balls than your ex-girlfriend
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Ferdinand is critical of mainstream narratives and encourages critical thinking to question established beliefs.
He asked why people believe the American or Soviet governments.
'There's no flame, there's no hole, there's no debris, and there's no noise.'
🎙️ Podcast episode
Ferdinand absolutely butchered the official narrative, in this episode for my UK Column show.
The audio episode is available on most podcast apps. If you use Apple, upgrade to the paid subscription to remove the ads.
Better yet, paid subscribers (above the first tier) to my website get access to my premium podcast, which has no ads and includes additional, exclusive content.
We’re constantly bombarded with fake news, propaganda, agendas, and outright lies.
It’s an information war.
What is true?
I don’t know either—but I’m trying to find out.
Dr Ferdinand Santos applies probability theory to argue the Artemis rocket couldn't have taken four astronauts to the moon and back. He points to technical impossibilities like battery and oxygen limits, plus obvious comedy—like the male astronauts having no beards after 10 days.
Was all of it staged? Some of it? I lean toward the latter. In my view, Charlie is no longer with us, but the shooting footage doesn't hold up. It looks like AI, riddled with continuity errors and sloppy editing. And no exit wound from a .30-06 caliber? Come on. That's not plausible.
Dr Ferdinand Santos III
