As a reminder, I record a livestream every Friday morning at 09:00 South African time, where I share my thoughts on various stuff or, like this week, have someone join me for coffee and we shoot the breeze.
9/11 Revisionist | Substack
The 9/11 “truth” movement forgot how to count past 3. Isn’t that strange? It won’t be easy for most to break their programming if they don’t have questions. Click to read 9/11 Revisionist, a Substack publication.
9/11 Revisionist
My friend Norman — known online as 9/11 Revisionist, with a brutal Substack — not only joined me for coffee, we ate a delicious breakfast together.
He's been on my livestream before and his focus, as you might have guessed, is understanding what actually happened on 9/11 and revising the narratives.
I think he needs to be vindicated in many ways because he was not the architect of apartheid. The British were.
— Jerm, in conversation with Norman
We didn't really chat much about 9/11 this time, but we did get into why former South African prime minister Hendrik Verwoerd's separate-nations vision could have worked but never played out in reality.
Jews, Soviets, and the Soweto Uprising
In 1976, the South African apartheid government forced Afrikaans on Black pupils, then shot them when they pushed back. Meanwhile, the Soviet and Jewish influence behind the event is almost entirely ignored. Why?
Jerm
We also bantered about
- South Africa's manufactured anti-immigration riots,
- the case for real borders, whether the pyramids were ancient power stations,
- why Darwinism is nonsense,
- the unsettling implications of Bob Greenyer's new 9/11 dust study,
- how multipolarity beats bending the knee to Washington,
- why the Amish are amazing,
- Michael Tellinger's stone circles,
- data centres as the new AI battleground for control,
- Charlie Kirk's oddly convenient assassination questions, and
- why it's important to listen to controversial guests.
I'll have Fauci on my show. I'll have Bill Gates. I'll have Hunter Biden on my show. That doesn't mean that I am going to agree with their conclusions.
— Jerm, in conversation with Norman
